IAS 37 · Free study guide

    IAS 37 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets: Summary, Practice Questions & Decision Tree

    Last updated 13 August 2026 · Written by the AccountingTutorAI team · Reviewed by a qualified CPA (Canada)

    Quick summary

    IAS 37 decides what to do with uncertain obligations: recognise a provision, disclose a contingent liability, or stay silent. A provision — a liability of uncertain timing or amount — is recognised only when three tests all pass: a present obligation from a past event, a probable outflow of resources, and a reliable estimate. Fail probability or measurement and the item drops to disclosure as a contingent liability; possible assets are held to an even stricter bar. Measurement is the best estimate of settling the obligation — expected values for large populations, most likely outcome for single events — discounted where the time value of money is material.

    The three-part recognition test

    A provision is recognised when — and only when — three conditions are all met (IAS 37.14): a present obligation (legal or constructive) as a result of a past event; a probable outflow of economic benefits, where probable means more likely than not; and a reliable estimate of the amount. The past event — the obligating event — must leave the entity no realistic alternative to settling: selling goods with a warranty creates the obligation at the point of sale, not when defects appear (IAS 37.17–19).

    Constructive obligations widen the net beyond contracts and legislation: an established pattern of past practice or a sufficiently specific public commitment can create a valid expectation that the entity will act, and with it a present obligation (IAS 37.10). A retailer with a well-publicised no-questions refund policy has an obligation for expected refunds even where the law demands none. What never qualifies: future operating losses — they lack a past event and may even signal an impairment test instead (IAS 37.63).

    Measurement: best estimate, expected values and discounting

    The amount recognised is the best estimate of the expenditure required to settle the obligation at the reporting date — what the entity would rationally pay to settle or transfer it (IAS 37.36–37). The technique depends on the population: for large populations of similar items, like warranty claims, the estimate is an expected value — each outcome weighted by its probability. For a single obligation, like one lawsuit, the most likely individual outcome is the starting point, adjusted where other outcomes are skewed to one side (IAS 37.39–40).

    Where the time value of money is material, the provision is discounted at a pre-tax rate reflecting the liability's risks; the unwinding of the discount each year is a finance cost, not an operating expense (IAS 37.45, 60). Risks and uncertainties are reflected in the estimate — but deliberate overstatement is prohibited: prudence is not a licence for hidden buffers (IAS 37.42–43). Reimbursements (insurance recoveries) are recognised as a separate asset, only when virtually certain, capped at the provision amount (IAS 37.53).

    Need the exact paragraph text? The AI Tutor quotes the official licensed IFRS Standards word-for-word.

    Try the AI Tutor

    Contingent liabilities and contingent assets

    A contingent liability is either a possible obligation whose existence awaits confirmation by uncertain future events, or a present obligation that fails the probability or measurement test (IAS 37.10). Contingent liabilities are never recognised — they are disclosed, unless the possibility of outflow is remote, in which case the notes stay silent too (IAS 37.27–28). Contingent assets face a higher bar: disclosed when an inflow is probable, recognised only when it becomes virtually certain — at which point it stops being contingent at all (IAS 37.31–35). The asymmetry is deliberate: the framework tolerates early recognition of losses far more readily than early recognition of gains.

    • Outflow probable + reliable estimate → recognise a provision
    • Outflow possible (or present obligation unmeasurable) → disclose a contingent liability
    • Outflow remote → no recognition, no disclosure
    • Inflow probable → disclose a contingent asset; inflow virtually certain → recognise the asset

    Onerous contracts

    A contract becomes onerous when the unavoidable costs of meeting it exceed the economic benefits expected from it (IAS 37.68). The provision equals the lower of the cost of fulfilling the contract and any compensation or penalty for exiting it — the rational choice between two bad options. Unavoidable costs of fulfilling comprise the costs that relate directly to the contract: both incremental costs and an allocation of other directly related costs (IAS 37.68A). Before providing, any assets dedicated to the contract are first tested for impairment (IAS 37.69).

    Restructuring provisions: the strict gate

    Restructurings — sale or termination of a business line, closures, relocations, fundamental reorganisations — get deliberately strict criteria, because managements historically used 'big bath' restructuring provisions to smooth profits. A constructive obligation arises only when the entity has a detailed formal plan (identifying the business, locations, employees affected, timing and expenditure) AND has raised a valid expectation in those affected — by starting implementation or announcing the plan's main features (IAS 37.72). A board decision alone is not enough (IAS 37.75).

    Even then, the provision includes only direct expenditures necessarily entailed by the restructuring: redundancy costs, lease terminations. Costs of the continuing business — retraining, relocating staff, marketing, new systems — are future operating costs and are excluded (IAS 37.80–81).

    Worked example: warranty provision by expected value

    A manufacturer sells 10,000 units in the year with a one-year warranty. Experience indicates that 75% of units will need no repair, 20% will need minor repairs costing CU 20 per unit, and 5% will need major repairs costing CU 120 per unit. The provision is the expected value across the population.

    Expected value of warranty costs
    OutcomeProbabilityCost per unit (CU)Expected cost (CU)
    No defects75%00
    Minor defects20%2040,000
    Major defects5%12060,000
    Warranty provision (10,000 units)100,000

    Expected cost per unit = (0.75 × 0) + (0.20 × 20) + (0.05 × 120) = CU 10; provision = 10,000 units × CU 10 = CU 100,000. Discounting is ignored as claims fall due within a year.

    At year end — recognise the provision
    AccountDr (CU)Cr (CU)
    Dr Warranty expense (P&L)100,000
    Cr Provision for warranties100,000
    Next year — actual repair costs of CU 94,000 incurred
    AccountDr (CU)Cr (CU)
    Dr Provision for warranties94,000
    Cr Cash / inventory (parts)94,000
    Next year — release the unused balance
    AccountDr (CU)Cr (CU)
    Dr Provision for warranties6,000
    Cr Warranty expense (P&L)6,000

    Actual claims of CU 94,000 are charged against the provision, not straight to expense, and the unused CU 6,000 is released — provisions are used only for the expenditure they were created for (IAS 37.61) and reviewed at each reporting date (IAS 37.59). Contrast a single court case: sued once, with lawyers advising a 60% chance of losing CU 500,000, the entity recognises the most likely outcome — a CU 500,000 provision — not 60% × 500,000 = 300,000; probability-weighting individual amounts is for populations, not one-off events. Had the loss probability been 30%, no provision at all: the case would be a disclosed contingent liability.

    Test yourself: 5 IAS 37 practice questions

    1. A company is sued during the year. Lawyers assess a 40% chance of losing, with damages of CU 200,000 if the case is lost. How is this reported?

    • A. A provision of CU 80,000
    • B. A provision of CU 200,000
    • C. A contingent liability disclosed in the notes
    • D. Nothing — litigation is never recognised or disclosed
    Show answer

    Correct answer: C

    At 40%, an outflow is possible but not probable (not more likely than not), so the recognition test fails and the case is disclosed as a contingent liability (IAS 37.23, 27–28). Probability-weighting to CU 80,000 is wrong twice over: expected value is for populations, and the recognition threshold isn't met at all.

    2. When can a restructuring provision be recognised?

    • A. As soon as the board approves the restructuring plan
    • B. When a detailed formal plan exists and its main features have been announced to (or implementation has begun for) those affected
    • C. When the entity expects losses from the restructuring in future budgets
    • D. Only when redundancy payments have been made
    Show answer

    Correct answer: B

    A board decision alone creates no obligation (IAS 37.75) — the entity needs a detailed formal plan plus a valid expectation raised in those affected, through announcement or the start of implementation (IAS 37.72). Future operating losses never qualify, and waiting for actual payment would be too late.

    3. Which costs are INCLUDED in a restructuring provision?

    • A. Retraining staff who remain with the business
    • B. Marketing to relaunch the restructured brand
    • C. Redundancy payments and lease termination penalties
    • D. Investment in new IT systems for the streamlined operations
    Show answer

    Correct answer: C

    Only direct expenditures necessarily entailed by the restructuring and not associated with ongoing activities qualify (IAS 37.80). Retraining, relocating continuing staff, marketing and new systems are costs of the future business and are expensed as incurred (IAS 37.81).

    4. An entity has a contract that will cost CU 90,000 to fulfil, generating benefits of CU 60,000. Cancelling it triggers a CU 25,000 penalty. What onerous contract provision is recognised?

    • A. CU 30,000
    • B. CU 25,000
    • C. CU 90,000
    • D. Nil — future losses are never provided for
    Show answer

    Correct answer: B

    The provision is the lower of the net cost of fulfilling (90,000 − 60,000 = 30,000) and the cost of exiting (25,000) — the rational entity exits, so CU 25,000 (IAS 37.68). This is a present obligation under an existing contract, not a future operating loss.

    5. A company expects a virtually certain insurance recovery of CU 80,000 against a recognised provision of CU 100,000. How is the recovery presented?

    • A. Netted against the provision, showing a CU 20,000 liability
    • B. As a separate asset of CU 80,000
    • C. Disclosed only, until cash is received
    • D. As a contingent asset in the notes
    Show answer

    Correct answer: B

    Virtually certain reimbursements are recognised as a separate asset, capped at the provision amount (IAS 37.53) — the balance sheet shows both gross. In profit or loss, the expense may be presented net of the recovery (IAS 37.54). Below virtual certainty it would remain a contingent asset.

    Go deeper with Pro

    Full IAS 37 summary in the standards library

    The complete in-app IAS 37 summary — key points, a quick-reference panel and plain-English explanations — in the Pro standards library.

    Unlock

    40 exam-style IAS 37 practice MCQs with AI explanations

    A 40-question quiz drawn from our 70-question IAS 37 bank with instant AI-graded feedback on every answer.

    Unlock

    Interactive provisions decision tree

    Tap through recognise / disclose / ignore for any uncertain obligation.

    Unlock

    Journal entry generator

    Describe any provision scenario in plain English and get the Dr/Cr entries built for you.

    Unlock

    Ask the AI Tutor

    Answers your exact scenario with word-for-word licensed IFRS paragraph citations.

    Unlock

    Study IAS 37 with an AI tutor

    AI-tutored explanations, exam-style practice questions, and interactive decision trees. Free to start.

    Start free

    Frequently asked questions

    What is the difference between a provision and a contingent liability?

    A provision passes all three recognition tests — present obligation from a past event, probable outflow, reliable estimate — and sits on the balance sheet (IAS 37.14). A contingent liability fails at least one: it is either a merely possible obligation, or a present one whose outflow isn't probable or measurable. It is disclosed in the notes, or ignored entirely if the outflow is remote (IAS 37.27–28).

    When can a restructuring provision be recognised?

    Only once a constructive obligation exists: a detailed formal plan (business, locations, employees, timing, cost) plus a valid expectation among those affected, created by announcing the plan's main features or starting implementation (IAS 37.72). A board decision by itself never suffices (IAS 37.75), and the provision covers only direct exit costs — never retraining, relocation or marketing for the continuing business (IAS 37.80–81).

    When is expected value used instead of the most likely outcome?

    Expected value — probability-weighting every outcome — measures large populations of similar items, like warranties or refunds (IAS 37.39). For a single obligation such as one lawsuit, the most likely individual outcome is the best estimate, adjusted if other outcomes cluster above or below it (IAS 37.40). Mixing the two up is the most common IAS 37 exam error.

    What is an onerous contract?

    One whose unavoidable costs of performance exceed the benefits expected from it (IAS 37.68). The provision is the lower of the net cost of fulfilling the contract and the penalty for exiting — after first impairing any assets dedicated to the contract (IAS 37.69). Fulfilment costs include incremental costs plus an allocation of directly related costs (IAS 37.68A).

    Are provisions discounted?

    Yes, where the time value of money is material — at a pre-tax rate reflecting the risks specific to the liability (IAS 37.45, 47). Long-dated obligations like decommissioning are heavily affected. Each year the discount unwinds, increasing the provision with the charge presented as a finance cost (IAS 37.60), not an operating expense.

    Can future operating losses be provided for?

    No (IAS 37.63). They arise from future events, not a past obligating event, so no present obligation exists — and an expectation of losses is instead a trigger to test the related assets for impairment under IAS 36. The one exception-shaped rule: losses locked in by an existing contract are handled through the onerous contract provision.

    Related standards