IAS 33 · Free study guide

    IAS 33 Earnings per Share Summary

    Last updated 13 September 2026 · Written by the AccountingTutorAI team · Reviewed by a qualified CPA (Canada)

    Quick summary

    IAS 33 sets out how listed entities calculate and present earnings per share — the single most quoted performance metric in financial statements, and one of the few IFRS figures analysts track religiously across periods and against consensus estimates. Basic EPS divides profit attributable to ordinary equity holders by the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding during the period; diluted EPS goes further and asks what EPS would look like if every dilutive option, warrant and convertible instrument were converted into ordinary shares today. The mechanics are formulaic once you know the rules, but three things trip up most candidates: correctly time-weighting shares issued partway through a year, correctly restating comparatives for a bonus issue or share split, and correctly building the theoretical ex-rights price adjustment for a rights issue. This guide walks through all three, plus the treasury stock method used for options and warrants in diluted EPS, with a full worked example covering a full-price issue, a bonus issue and a convertible bond in the same year.

    Who has to present EPS, and why it matters

    IAS 33 is mandatory for entities whose ordinary shares (or potential ordinary shares) are publicly traded, and for entities in the process of issuing ordinary shares to the public. EPS is a widely used performance indicator, but it has real limits as a comparator: different entities use different accounting policies in arriving at 'profit,' and EPS says nothing about the quality or sustainability of that profit, or about how much capital was used to generate it — comparing EPS across entities with very different capital structures can be misleading without also looking at measures such as return on capital employed.

    Basic EPS: the formula and the weighted average

    Basic EPS = profit attributable to ordinary equity holders of the parent (after deducting preference dividends) ÷ the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding during the period.

    The weighted average time-weights shares by the portion of the period they were in issue, and three situations change how that weighting works:

    • A full-price issue partway through the year (for example a placing for cash): the new shares are time-weighted from their issue date to the period end — no restatement of comparatives is needed, because no shareholder received something for nothing.
    • A bonus issue (or share split) at any point during the year: the additional shares are treated as if they had always been in issue, from the start of the earliest period presented — comparative EPS figures are restated for the bonus issue even though no new resources came into the entity.
    • A rights issue below fair value: because a rights issue is part bonus element (shares issued below fair value) and part full-price issue, it is split into the two components using a theoretical ex-rights price (TERP) adjustment factor, computed as the fair value per share immediately before the rights issue divided by the theoretical ex-rights price per share.

    Need the exact paragraph text? The AI Tutor quotes the official licensed IFRS Standards word-for-word.

    Try the AI Tutor

    Diluted EPS: the principle

    Diluted EPS asks what basic EPS would have been if every dilutive potential ordinary share outstanding — convertible bonds, convertible preference shares, share options and warrants, and some contingently issuable shares — had actually converted into ordinary shares at the start of the period (or the date of issue, if later).

    Convertible instruments

    For a convertible bond or convertible preference share, both the numerator and the denominator change if conversion is assumed: profit is adjusted by adding back the after-tax finance cost (interest) or preference dividend that would no longer be paid, and the number of shares is increased by the shares that would be issued on conversion.

    Options and warrants: the treasury stock method

    Options and warrants are not assumed to generate new shares in full. Instead, the treasury stock method assumes the proceeds the entity would receive on exercise are used to buy back shares at the average market price for the period; only the difference between the shares issued on exercise and the shares that notional buyback could fund — the 'bonus element' of the option — is treated as dilutive.

    Contingently issuable shares and antidilutive instruments

    Contingently issuable shares are included in diluted EPS based on the number of shares that would be issuable if the end of the reporting period were the end of the contingency period, assuming the conditions are met at that date. An instrument is excluded from diluted EPS entirely if including it would increase EPS (or decrease a loss per share) rather than decrease it — such an instrument is antidilutive, and antidilutive and dilutive instruments are never netted against each other.

    Presentation

    Basic and diluted EPS are presented on the face of the statement of profit or loss with equal prominence, for profit or loss from continuing operations and, where applicable, for total profit or loss. Comparative EPS figures are restated for the effects of bonus issues, share splits and similar events that change the number of shares without a corresponding change in resources, but not for the effects of a full-price share issue.

    Worked example: weighted average shares plus a convertible bond

    At 1 January Year 1, Entity has 10,000,000 ordinary shares in issue. On 1 July Year 1, Entity issues 2,000,000 new ordinary shares at full market price for cash. On 1 November Year 1, Entity makes a 1-for-5 bonus issue (one new share for every five held) out of the shares in issue immediately before the bonus issue. Profit attributable to ordinary equity holders for Year 1 is $18,000,000. Entity also has a convertible bond in issue all year, which generated $2,000,000 of after-tax finance cost for the year and is convertible into 1,500,000 ordinary shares.

    Weighted average number of ordinary shares — Year 1 (bonus issue applied retrospectively)
    TrancheShares (bonus-adjusted × 1.2)Months in issueWeighted shares
    10,000,000 shares in issue from 1 Jan12,000,00012/1212,000,000
    2,000,000 shares issued 1 Jul (full price)2,400,0006/121,200,000
    Weighted average ordinary shares, Year 113,200,000

    The 1-for-5 bonus issue on 1 November (2,400,000 new shares) is not shown as its own tranche. Because a bonus issue is treated as if it had always been outstanding, its effect is captured by grossing up every pre-existing tranche by the bonus factor of 1.2 (six shares for every five held after the bonus), not by time-weighting the bonus shares only from their issue date.

    Basic EPS = $18,000,000 ÷ 13,200,000 = $1.364 (3 d.p.). For diluted EPS: profit is adjusted to $18,000,000 + $2,000,000 after-tax interest add-back = $20,000,000, and the denominator is adjusted to 13,200,000 + 1,500,000 convertible shares = 14,700,000, giving diluted EPS = $20,000,000 ÷ 14,700,000 = $1.361 (3 d.p.). Diluted EPS is lower than basic, confirming the bond is genuinely dilutive — a useful cross-check is that the bond's own incremental EPS ($2,000,000 extra profit ÷ 1,500,000 extra shares = $1.333) is lower than basic EPS ($1.364), which is exactly the condition for an instrument to reduce EPS on conversion. If an instrument's incremental EPS is higher than basic EPS, including it would increase EPS, making it antidilutive and excluded entirely. This worked example has no journal entries because EPS is a calculation for disclosure purposes, not a transaction recognised in the accounting records.

    Test yourself: 5 IAS 33 practice questions

    1. A 1-for-4 bonus issue takes place on 1 October, Year 2. How does this affect the weighted average number of shares for Year 2, and the comparative EPS for Year 1?

    • A. The bonus shares are time-weighted only from 1 October, Year 2; Year 1's comparative EPS is unaffected
    • B. The bonus shares are treated as outstanding for the whole of both Year 2 and Year 1; Year 1's comparative EPS is restated using the higher, post-bonus share count
    • C. The bonus shares affect Year 2 only; Year 1 is never restated under any circumstances
    • D. The bonus issue is ignored for EPS purposes because no cash was raised
    Show answer

    Correct answer: B

    A bonus issue is treated as if it had always been outstanding, so both the current period and every comparative period are grossed up by the bonus factor. A wrongly time-weights the bonus shares like a full-price issue. C is incorrect — bonus issues specifically require comparative restatement. D confuses the absence of new resources with the requirement to restate, which applies precisely because no new resources came in.

    2. What does the theoretical ex-rights price (TERP) adjustment factor achieve in an EPS calculation?

    • A. It removes the rights issue from the weighted average calculation entirely
    • B. It splits a rights issue into its bonus element and its full-price element for weighting purposes
    • C. It converts diluted EPS back into basic EPS
    • D. It replaces the need to calculate a weighted average at all
    Show answer

    Correct answer: B

    Because a rights issue combines shares issued below fair value (a bonus-like element) with shares issued for cash, the TERP factor restates pre-rights-issue shares so the bonus element is captured consistently, similar to a bonus issue. A, C and D all describe things the TERP adjustment does not do.

    3. A company has share options outstanding, exercisable below the average market price for the period. Under the treasury stock method, what portion of the shares issuable on exercise is treated as dilutive?

    • A. All of the shares issuable on exercise
    • B. None of the shares — options are never dilutive
    • C. Only the 'bonus element' — the shares issued on exercise less the shares the notional exercise proceeds could buy back at the average market price
    • D. Only the shares issuable in the final quarter of the period
    Show answer

    Correct answer: C

    The treasury stock method assumes exercise proceeds buy back shares at the average market price; only the excess shares beyond what that notional buyback could fund are dilutive. A overstates the effect by ignoring the notional buyback. B is incorrect — options with an exercise price below the average market price are dilutive. D introduces a timing rule the method does not use.

    4. In calculating diluted EPS for a convertible bond, what happens to the numerator (profit attributable to ordinary equity holders)?

    • A. It is reduced by the bond's after-tax finance cost
    • B. It is increased by the after-tax finance cost that would no longer be paid if the bond converted
    • C. It is unaffected — only the denominator changes for convertible instruments
    • D. It is increased by the full pre-tax finance cost of the bond
    Show answer

    Correct answer: B

    Assuming conversion means the bond's after-tax interest would no longer be paid, so profit is increased by that amount — consistent with also increasing the share count in the denominator. A reverses the direction of the adjustment. C is wrong because both numerator and denominator change for convertible instruments. D incorrectly uses the pre-tax rather than after-tax interest figure.

    5. Including a particular instrument in diluted EPS would increase EPS from $1.20 to $1.25. How should the instrument be treated?

    • A. Included, because any potential ordinary share must be included in diluted EPS
    • B. Excluded — it is antidilutive, and antidilutive and dilutive instruments are never netted against each other
    • C. Included, but only in half of the reporting periods presented
    • D. Included only if the entity has no other dilutive instruments
    Show answer

    Correct answer: B

    An instrument whose inclusion increases EPS is antidilutive and must be excluded from diluted EPS entirely, regardless of what other instruments exist. A overstates the inclusion rule — only dilutive instruments are included. C invents a partial-period rule that does not exist. D wrongly makes exclusion conditional on other instruments.

    Go deeper with Pro

    Full IAS 33 summary in the standards library

    The complete in-app IAS 33 summary — key points, a quick-reference panel and plain-English explanations — in the Pro standards library.

    Unlock

    40 exam-style IAS 33 practice MCQs with AI explanations

    A 40-question quiz drawn from our 70-question IAS 33 bank on weighted average shares, bonus and rights issues, and diluted EPS, each with instant AI-graded feedback.

    Unlock

    Basic vs diluted EPS build decision tree

    Work any share issue, bonus issue, rights issue or convertible instrument through the questions to build the weighted average and the diluted EPS adjustment correctly.

    Unlock

    Journal entry generator

    Describe a share issue, bonus issue or convertible instrument in plain English and get the Dr/Cr entries built for you.

    Unlock

    Ask the AI Tutor

    Paste an EPS scenario with multiple share movements and get the weighted average, basic EPS and diluted EPS worked through with IFRS paragraph citations.

    Unlock

    Study IAS 33 with an AI tutor

    AI-tutored explanations, exam-style practice questions, and interactive decision trees. Free to start.

    Start free

    Frequently asked questions

    How is basic EPS calculated?

    Profit attributable to ordinary equity holders of the parent, after deducting preference dividends, divided by the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding during the period.

    How does a bonus issue affect EPS and comparatives?

    Bonus shares are treated as if they had always been in issue, from the start of the earliest period presented. That means both the current period's weighted average and every comparative EPS figure are restated using the higher, post-bonus share count — even though no new resources came into the entity.

    What does a rights issue do to the calculation?

    A rights issue is split into a bonus element and a full-price element using the theoretical ex-rights price (TERP): the fair value per share immediately before the issue divided by the theoretical ex-rights price. This adjustment factor is applied to shares in issue before the rights issue date, similar to how a bonus factor is applied.

    What is diluted EPS, and when is an instrument antidilutive?

    Diluted EPS shows what EPS would be if every dilutive potential ordinary share converted into actual shares. An instrument is antidilutive — and excluded from diluted EPS — if including it would increase EPS (or reduce a loss per share) rather than decrease it.

    How do share options affect diluted EPS?

    Through the treasury stock method: the proceeds from exercise are assumed to buy back shares at the average market price for the period, and only the shares issued in excess of that notional buyback are treated as dilutive and added to the denominator.

    Does EPS have to be shown on the face of the financial statements?

    Yes. Basic and diluted EPS are both presented on the face of the statement of profit or loss, with equal prominence, for continuing operations and for total profit or loss where applicable — not left to the notes.

    Related standards